Timcast IRL · January 31, 2022 · 2h 0m
Timcast IRL - Uncensored: YouTube BANS Judicial Watch Video After They Call out Dirty Voter Rolls And CA Government Demands It w/Tom Fitton
Episode Recap
In this Timcast IRL episode, Tim Pool and co-host Ian Crossland engaged in an extensive discussion about the 2020 presidential election, focusing on constitutional and procedural concerns rather than outright fraud claims. Tim articulated his position that Trump won on Election Day but the result was changed due to unprecedented post-election ballot counting that he argued violated constitutional requirements. The discussion covered controversial changes to voting rules in states like Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, including universal mail-in voting implemented before the 2020 election. Tim expressed frustration with courts that refused to hear election cases on procedural grounds, arguing that regardless of whether fraud occurred, the process was fundamentally compromised. The hosts referenced a Time Magazine article about a "shadow campaign" to protect Biden's candidacy and discussed reports of Democrats wargaming alternative elector slates. Tim distinguished between voter fraud and election fraud, arguing that changes to election procedures by Democrats in Pennsylvania were designed to favor their party. The Arizona audit was mentioned, with Tim expressing skepticism about why results hadn't been released despite promises of significant findings.
TL;DR
- →Tim Pool explained his position that Trump won on Election Day but the result was altered by constitutionally questionable post-election ballot counting in key states.
- →The hosts discussed how courts refused to hear election cases on procedural grounds, leaving constitutional questions unanswered.
- →Tim argued that mail-in voting and early voting changes were incompatible with the Constitution's single Election Day requirement.
- →The conversation referenced a Time Magazine article about a coordinated "shadow campaign" to protect the 2020 election result.
- →Tim distinguished between voter fraud and election fraud, arguing that procedural violations were more significant than individual fraud claims.
- →The hosts discussed reports of Democrats wargaming alternative elector scenarios if Trump had won, suggesting awareness of potential constitutional crises.
Key Moments
- 0:00OpeningIntroduction to the uncensored Timcast IRL format and initial context about the episode's topics
- 15:00Election AnalysisTim presents his constitutional argument about the 2020 election and what he believes went wrong procedurally
- 35:00Court System CritiqueDiscussion of how courts handled election challenges and why they refused to rule on merits
- 60:00Time Magazine ArticleAnalysis of the reported shadow campaign to protect Biden's candidacy
- 90:00Fraud vs. Election IntegrityTim distinguishes between voter fraud and constitutional election violations
Notable Quotes
“Trump won on Election Day and the results of that election victory were changed as a result of unprecedented and arguably unlawful voting that took place or counting that took place after election day.”
— Tim Pool · opening statement about the 2020 election
“The Constitution says there is one day for the election. We had early voting. We had universal mail-in voting. We had rules being changed across the board. And then we had late counting. That's not in the fucking constitution. It's an abomination.”
— Tim Pool · constitutional argument about election procedures
“The mistake that Trump supporters have made is they feel the need to prove fraud when they don't need to. They were unlawfully counted votes.”
— Ian Crossland · analysis of the legal strategy
“If you go to a bank and they're blacking out all the cameras and they don't keep records and there are no rules, an auditor presumes something went on.”
— Tim Pool · explaining why fraud doesn't need to be proven
“The courts failed the American people. The courts never actually heard any of the merits of these cases.”
— Tim Pool · critique of the judicial system